Skip to content

HIPS vs ABS

HIPS vs ABS: Printing Profile and Practical Differences ✅Source
AttributeHIPS FilamentABS FilamentWhy It Matters
Typical RoleSupport-friendly and general-purpose partsFunctional parts and durable housingsMany users keep HIPS filament for supports, while ABS filament is often picked for parts that will see higher heat.
Recommended Nozzle Range (°C)225–255230–255Both can live in a similar hot-end range, so the same hardware can often run HIPS filament and ABS filament.
Recommended Bed Range (°C)100–11095–110Bed temperature is a big driver for first-layer stability on HIPS and ABS.
Enclosure (Typical)NoRecommendedA steady print environment can help keep ABS filament parts consistent, especially on larger footprints.
Dimensional Feel While CoolingStable feel on larger shapesThermal contraction is more noticeableThis is why users often talk about HIPS filament for big pieces and ABS filament with temperature control.
Surface CharacterSmooth, “clean” plastic lookClassic matte-to-satin engineering lookIf you want a tidy surface out of the nozzle, HIPS filament is known for a neat finish; ABS filament is popular for a more “industrial” look.
Solvent-Style Post OptionsOften discussed with d-limonene and acetoneOften discussed with acetonePost-processing talk around HIPS filament and ABS filament often centers on how they react to common solvents.
Common PairingSupports for more complex printsStandalone parts; sometimes paired with supportsPeople often keep HIPS filament on hand specifically for support work, while ABS filament is a main build material.
  • HIPS Support Material
  • ABS Engineering Feel
  • Both High-Temp Printing
  • Both Good Impact Profiles

When people compare HIPS filament and ABS filament, they’re usually deciding between a support-friendly plastic and a classic engineering thermoplastic. They can print in similar heat ranges, yet their “personality” on the bed feels different. This page keeps it spec-first, with real numbers where a reliable reference exists.

Material Identity and Polymer Structure

HIPS Filament
High Impact Polystyrene is polystyrene modified with rubber additives, often used in 3D printing as a soluble-support-capable filament and also for regular parts with a smooth, tidy finish ✅Source
ABS Filament
Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene is commonly described as a blend of an acrylonitrile-styrene copolymer with an elastomeric (often butadiene-based) component, giving ABS its well-known balance of stiffness and toughness ✅Source

What “Feels” Different in Practice

HIPS filament often comes across as smooth and stable on larger shapes, while ABS filament is known for a more heat-resilient vibe in functional parts. Both are amorphous plastics, so they don’t have a sharp melt point like some semi-crystalline materials.

Keyword Match for Search and Clarity

  • HIPS filament: high impact polystyrene, rubber-modified PS, dissolvable-support discussions
  • ABS filament: acrylonitrile butadiene styrene, heat-tolerant parts, engineering plastic
  • HIPS vs ABS: nozzle temperature overlap, bed temperature, enclosure behavior

Temperature Behavior and Dimensional Stability

ABS filament is typically discussed in the context of a higher glass transition region, and the ABS family can show a visible transition around 100–105°C depending on the ABS type ✅Source. That helps explain why ABS filament parts are often chosen for environments that feel “warm” to the touch.

Relative Heat Confidence (visual, not a lab scale)

HIPS
ABS

What Cooling Can Look Like on Real Parts

HIPS filament is often described as having good dimensional stability, which helps when the footprint gets big. ABS filament can show a more noticeable thermal contraction feel as it cools, which is why many profiles pair ABS with a steadier ambient temperature.


Resin Datasheet Numbers (Reference-Style)

These values are shown as reference points from resin datasheets. Filament brands can differ due to pigments, additives, and extrusion targets. Still, this gives a grounded feel for how HIPS and ABS typically sit on standardized tests.

Example HIPS Resin Values (STYRON 438)

PropertyTypical ValueUnit / Method
Density1.04g/cm³ (ASTM D792)
Melt Flow Rate5g/10 min (ASTM D1238, 200°C/5 kg)
Tensile Strength (Yield)4800 psi (≈33.1 MPa)ASTM D638
Flexural Modulus372000 psi (≈2565 MPa)ASTM D790
Notched Izod (23°C)1.7 ft-lb/in (≈90.7 J/m)ASTM D256
Vicat Softening Point105°C (ASTM D1525)
HDT @ 1.82 MPa (Unannealed)77.2°C (ASTM D648)

Grade reference STYRON 438 is documented as a high-impact polystyrene resin with the typical values listed above ✅Source.

Example ABS Resin Values (LG Chem HI121)

PropertyTypical ValueUnit / Method
Specific Gravity1.04ISO 1183
Melt Flow Rate21g/10 min (ISO 1133, 220°C/10 kg)
Tensile Strength at Yield46MPa (ISO 527)
Flexural Modulus2200MPa (ISO 178)
Izod Notched (23°C, 4 mm)28kJ/m² (ISO 180/1A)
Vicat Softening Temperature93°C (ISO 306, 50N)
HDT @ 1.8 MPa (Unannealed)75°C (ISO 75)

HI121 is an ABS injection-molding grade with the typical physical, mechanical, and thermal values shown above, useful as a grounded reference for ABS family behavior ✅Source.


Support Behavior and Solvent Compatibility

HIPS filament gets a lot of attention as soluble support, especially when the goal is clean internal channels or complex overhang zones. Many profiles treat ABS filament as a standalone build material first, then add a support strategy if needed. The big idea is simple: HIPS is often chosen when “support removal” is part of the plan, while ABS is often chosen when “part performance” is the star.


HIPS Filament Signals

  • Nozzle: often placed in the 225–255°C range in common profiles
  • Bed: commonly shown around 100–110°C
  • Behavior: frequently described as stable on larger parts with a tidy surface feel

If you’re scanning a slicer preset list, HIPS filament typically looks “close to ABS filament” on raw temperatures, yet the support story and surface character often stand out.

ABS Filament Signals

  • Nozzle: commonly shown around 230–255°C in many profiles
  • Bed: often placed in the 95–110°C range
  • Environment: profiles frequently reference a steadier print space for consistency

In many ecosystems, ABS filament presets are the ones that “look most like engineering plastic,” especially when you compare them to HIPS filament presets side by side.


Air and Indoor Comfort Considerations

Material extrusion printing can release gases and ultrafine particles during heating, and emissions can vary by filament type and setup. EPA research summaries describe VOCs and ultrafine particle emissions in consumer-style printing, including work that specifically mentions ABS as a common filament studied ✅Source. Many users treat good airflow as a normal part of running HIPS filament and ABS filament.


Use-Case Matching (Multi-Angle)

This section stays descriptive. It lists where each material is commonly seen, based on typical community and manufacturer positioning, without pushing a “do this” checklist.

Where HIPS Filament Commonly Shows Up

  • Soluble-support discussions for complex geometries and internal channels
  • Large, clean-looking parts where a smooth surface is valued
  • Projects that like easy sanding and a tidy finish path

People who keep HIPS filament in their lineup often like its support flexibility and the way HIPS can act as a clean “helper material” next to other common filaments.

Where ABS Filament Commonly Shows Up

  • Functional enclosures and parts that see warm environments
  • Durability-focused builds where the toughness feel matters
  • Engineering-style prototypes where temperature behavior is a key constraint

ABS filament stays popular because it sits in a comfortable zone between strength and impact resistance. It’s also a familiar material across many manufacturing contexts, which is why ABS stays easy to spec and discuss.

A Simple Comparison Lens

  1. Support-first thinking tends to pull attention toward HIPS filament.
  2. Heat-first thinking tends to pull attention toward ABS filament.
  3. Profile overlap is real; the “why” usually comes from use-case and post-processing intent.
Author

Beverly Damon N. is a seasoned 3D Materials Specialist with over 10 years of hands-on experience in additive manufacturing and polymer science. Since 2016, she has dedicated her career to analyzing the mechanical properties, thermal stability, and printability of industrial filaments.Having tested thousands of spools across various FDM/FFF platforms, Beverly bridges the gap between complex material datasheets and real-world printing performance. Her expertise lies in identifying the subtle nuances between virgin resins and recycled alternatives, helping professionals and enthusiasts make data-driven decisions. At FilamentCompare, she leads the technical research team to ensure every comparison is backed by empirical evidence and industry standards.View Author posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *