Skip to content

Nylon vs PETG

AttributeNylon FilamentPETG Filament
Material FamilyPolyamide (often PA12, PA6, or CoPA in filament form)Copolyester (glycol-modified PET, commonly called PETG)
Typical Look and FeelEngineering texture, often a satin surface; can feel low-friction and “smooth to the touch”Often glossy; many grades can be clear or translucent with a “glassier” look
Thermal Marker (Baseline Polymer Data) One PA12 reference lists melting temperature: 180 °C and provides moisture uptake values under defined conditions ✅Source Eastman’s Eastar™ 6763 notes Tg ≈ 80 °C and emphasizes the grade’s amorphous nature; it also specifies a typical drying target of <0.04% moisture (with a listed drying condition of 65 °C for 6 hours) ✅Source
Moisture InteractionMoisture-interactive by nature; material behavior can shift with humidity history (dry vs conditioned)Moisture-aware too, but commonly treated as more “steady” in everyday handling compared to many polyamides
Published FFF Dataset Snapshot (One Study, One Setup) Study printing parameters for the “nylon” sample (a PA6-CF material): 280 °C nozzle, 50 °C bed, 30 mm/s, 0.2 mm layer. The same study reports long-immersion mass gain around 12.7% at the equilibrium region. ✅Source Same study parameters for PETG: 255 °C nozzle, 70 °C bed, 30 mm/s, 0.2 mm layer. The same study reports long-immersion mass gain around 9.3% at the equilibrium region.
What This Table Means Numbers vary with grade, fillers (like CF/GF), manufacturing, and conditioning. The goal here is a clean comparison frame, not a “one number fits all” claim.
Nylon vs PETG comparison built from public technical literature and a published FFF dataset.

When people say Nylon filament and PETG filament, they’re usually talking about two very different polymer “personalities.” Nylon is a polyamide family with a reputation for tough, functional parts. PETG is a copolyester known for a clean surface, balanced toughness, and a stable feel across many everyday prints.

  • Nylon: polyamide character
  • PETG: copolyester character
  • Humidity can shift nylon
  • Clarity is common in PETG
  • Low-friction feel (common)
  • Glossy surface (common)

Material Identity and Polymer DNA

Nylon Filament as a Polyamide Family

Nylon is a broad polyamide family, so “nylon filament” can mean PA12, PA6, copolyamides, or blends. That family identity shows up as a mix of toughness, wear friendliness, and a smooth sliding feel that many engineering parts benefit from. In practice, nylon filaments often lean into mechanical durability and functional performance rather than pure visual gloss.

PETG Filament as a Copolyester Family

PETG is a glycol-modified copolyester designed to keep a clear, glossy look while staying tough and impact-friendly. PETG often feels “clean” in printed parts: a consistent surface, a balanced flex, and a predictable material response that’s easy to recognize across many brands.


Thermal Behavior and Heat Limits

Glass Transition (Tg)
Tg is the “softening region” where a polymer shifts toward a more rubbery behavior. It’s a big deal for parts that see warm environments and steady loads.
Melting (for semi-crystalline materials)
Many nylons are semi-crystalline, so they have a melting point where crystals melt. Many PETG grades are described as amorphous, so the Tg zone tends to be the main thermal “edge.”
Heat Deflection (HDT)
HDT describes bending under a defined load at temperature. It’s a useful comparison metric for real part stiffness at heat.

Reality check: nylon and PETG both have “heat stories,” but they look different. Nylon often has a semi-crystalline structure that influences how it handles warmth, while PETG commonly leans on Tg-driven softening behavior. That difference is why a nylon part and a PETG part can feel very different in the same warm room.


Moisture Interaction and Stability Over Time

Nylon is widely treated as humidity-responsive: the same spool can behave slightly differently when it’s very dry versus when it’s conditioned by ambient air. PETG is also moisture-aware (copolyesters can be sensitive during melt processing), but it’s often described as more steady in everyday printing workflows.

In real parts, moisture shows up less like a “problem” and more like a material variable. With nylon, humidity can shift flexibility, feel, and sometimes the final dimensions by small amounts. With PETG, moisture is often discussed in terms of melt consistency and keeping the polymer’s molecular integrity stable.

  1. Nylon can shift between a crisp and a more ductile feel depending on conditioning history.
  2. PETG is often described as consistent in feel, with humidity showing up mainly as a processing variable.
  3. Published immersion data exists for both materials, but results depend strongly on print porosity and test geometry.

Mechanical Feel in Printed Parts

Nylon filament often reads as tough and forgiving under repeated movement. That’s why it gets attention for parts where wear, sliding, and impact energy matter. PETG filament usually feels like a balanced middle: a mix of strength and flex that’s easy to recognize across functional prints.

Nylon Strength Style

  • Toughness and energy absorption are common themes in nylon discussions.
  • A low-friction feel can support moving interfaces and contact surfaces.
  • Many nylon grades are known for durable fatigue behavior in repeated flexing scenarios.

PETG Strength Style

  • Balanced ductility with a confident feel is a common PETG trait.
  • Layer bonding is often described as strong, especially on well-tuned profiles.
  • A sturdy shell plus slight flex makes PETG popular for functional housings and brackets.

Surface, Finish, and Visual Behavior

If visual finish is part of the decision, PETG and nylon speak different “design languages.” PETG often delivers a clean sheen and light-friendly translucency. Nylon often delivers a professional, technical surface with a satin look that hides minor handling marks nicely.

  • PETG: often glossy, can be clear or translucent depending on grade and color.
  • Nylon: typically less reflective, with a functional aesthetic and soft texture.
  • Both materials can look “premium” when geometry supports consistent cooling and smooth walls.

Chemical Contact, Wear, and Friction

Nylon is often selected for parts that see movement, sliding, or repeated contact because many polyamides are associated with low friction and abrasion friendliness. PETG is commonly described as chemically practical for many everyday environments, especially when the goal is a tough part with a clean surface.

Additives matter. Carbon fiber, glass fiber, and specialty modifiers can shift the wear profile, stiffness, and the surface feel of both nylon and PETG without changing their “family name.”


Relative Comparison Meters

Moisture Interaction Nylon PETG

Nylon
PETG

Clarity Potential Nylon PETG

Nylon
PETG

Low-Friction / Wear Feel Nylon PETG

Nylon
PETG

“Balanced Everyday Toughness” Feel Nylon PETG

Nylon
PETG

These meters are relative. They visualize common material tendencies for nylon filament and PETG filament. Specific brands, fillers, and conditioning can shift the “feel” in either direction.


Author

Beverly Damon N. is a seasoned 3D Materials Specialist with over 10 years of hands-on experience in additive manufacturing and polymer science. Since 2016, she has dedicated her career to analyzing the mechanical properties, thermal stability, and printability of industrial filaments.Having tested thousands of spools across various FDM/FFF platforms, Beverly bridges the gap between complex material datasheets and real-world printing performance. Her expertise lies in identifying the subtle nuances between virgin resins and recycled alternatives, helping professionals and enthusiasts make data-driven decisions. At FilamentCompare, she leads the technical research team to ensure every comparison is backed by empirical evidence and industry standards.View Author posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *