Skip to content

ABS vs PLA

  • PLA
ABS and PLA filaments are shown side by side, with their spool colors visible.
ABS vs PLA Filament Comparison Table
CategoryABS FilamentPLA FilamentWhat This Changes In Practice
Material IdentityAcrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene (engineering thermoplastic) ✅SourcePolylactic Acid (PLA, Ingeo family) ✅SourceSets the tone for thermal behavior, surface feel, and typical use cases.
Nozzle Temperature225–260 °C (UltiMaker ABS profiles) ✅Source200–210 °C (UltiMaker PLA profiles) ✅SourceDirectly impacts layer fusion, detail, and print consistency.
Build Plate Temperature80–90 °C (UltiMaker ABS) ✅Source60 °C (UltiMaker PLA) ✅SourceShapes first-layer stability and how well parts stay flat on longer prints.
Density1.04 g/cm³ ✅Source1.24 g/cc (specific gravity) ✅SourceAffects part weight for the same volume and helps estimate material usage.
Tensile Yield Strength47 MPa (ISO 527) ✅Source51 MPa (ASTM D638, typical bars) ✅SourceUseful for comparing stiff, load-bearing shapes (real prints depend on geometry and settings).
Impact Strength320 J/m notched Izod (ASTM D256) ✅Source118 J/m notched Izod (ASTM D256, crystalline) ✅SourceHints at how parts handle bumps, drops, and snap loads.
Heat Deflection Temperature94 °C at 0.45 MPa (ASTM D648, unannealed) ✅Source80–90 °C at 0.45 MPa (annealed 3D print data) ✅SourceMore relevant than “melting point” for warm environments and functional parts.
Vicat Softening98–100 °C (ISO 306) ✅SourceNot listed on this specific PLA sheet (Vicat is grade-dependent)Good for understanding when a surface starts to feel soft under temperature.
Print Bed NeedCommonly heated (profile-based) ✅SourceOften heated (typical 60 °C profiles) ✅SourceHelps interpret why some printers ship with different defaults for each material.
Data ContextValues shown are standard-test material data for an ABS-based grade ✅SourceSheet includes typical bars and notes about 3D printed / annealed conditions ✅SourceSame material can behave differently depending on orientation, infill, and heat history.

ABS and PLA sit at the center of FDM/FFF 3D printing. ABS filament is known as an engineering thermoplastic in many industries ✅Source, while PLA filament comes from the polylactic acid family used across a wide range of plastic applications ✅Source. The real difference shows up in temperature windows, mechanical feel, and how parts behave after printing.

  • ABS: higher nozzle range
  • PLA: common 200–210 °C profiles
  • ABS: 80–90 °C bed profiles
  • PLA: 60 °C bed profiles
  • Both: results depend on settings

Material Identity and Core Behavior

ABS Filament Profile

ABS is widely described as hard, tough, and heat-resistant in engineering plastic contexts ✅Source. In practical printing terms, it often pairs with higher nozzle temperatures and a heated build plate.

  • Nozzle range: 225–260 °C on common profiles ✅Source
  • Bed range: 80–90 °C on common profiles ✅Source
  • Material density: 1.04 g/cm³ (typical data point) ✅Source

PLA Filament Profile

PLA sits in the polylactic acid family and is offered in many grades, including additive-manufacturing focused materials like Ingeo 3D850 ✅Source. Across many printers, you’ll see lower nozzle profiles than ABS and a moderate bed temperature. For a broader explanation of how different PLA variants behave in printing—including PLA+, HT-PLA, and other modified formulations—see the Ultimate PLA Filament Guide.

  • Nozzle profile: 200–210 °C (common profiles) ✅Source
  • Bed profile: 60 °C (common profiles) ✅Source
  • Specific gravity: 1.24 g/cc (3D850 sheet) ✅Source

Relative Feel Across Key Categories

These meters are a visual comparison, not lab results. They help map how ABS filament and PLA filament are commonly positioned by makers and material data sheets: heat behavior, impact response, and stiffness.

Thermal Headroom (higher tends to favor warm environments)

ABS
PLA

Impact Response (notched Izod hints at “bump handling”)

ABS
PLA

Stiff, Clean Detail (often associated with crisp edges)

ABS
PLA

Numbers That Matter When Comparing Prints

Thermal Behavior: What “Heat Resistance” Really Uses

Heat Deflection Temperature (HDT)
ABS: 94 °C at 0.45 MPa (ASTM D648, unannealed) ✅Source
PLA (3D850): 80–90 °C at 0.45 MPa (data shown for annealed 3D prints on the sheet) ✅Source
Vicat Softening Temperature
ABS: 98–100 °C (ISO 306) ✅Source
PLA: varies heavily by grade; Vicat may be listed on the filament’s own TDS (not universal).
Glass Transition (Tg)
PLA (3D850): 55–60 °C (ASTM D3418) ✅Source
ABS: Tg is commonly shown on grade-level datasheets; it’s formulation-dependent, so this page avoids guessing a single number.

Why HDT shows up so often: It ties temperature to load. That makes it more meaningful for ABS functional parts and PLA functional parts than “melting point” alone.

Mechanical Behavior: Strength, Stiffness, and Impact

ABS Mechanical Data Points

  • Tensile stress at yield: 47 MPa (ISO 527) ✅Source
  • Tensile modulus: 2370 MPa (ISO 527) ✅Source
  • Notched Izod: 320 J/m (ASTM D256, 23 °C) ✅Source

Interpretation: These points are often used when a part needs a more impact-friendly feel along with thermal headroom in the same design space.

PLA Mechanical Data Points

  • Tensile yield strength: 51 MPa (ASTM D638, typical) ✅Source
  • Tensile modulus: 2315 MPa (ASTM D638, typical) ✅Source
  • Notched Izod: 118 J/m (ASTM D256, crystalline) ✅Source

Interpretation: PLA grades are often valued for stiff, clean shapes and precise detail, with performance shifting notably by grade and heat history.


Instead of vague claims, it helps to look at how real printer ecosystems publish ABS profiles and PLA profiles. UltiMaker, for example, shows ABS nozzle temperatures spanning 225–260 °C ✅Source and PLA nozzle temperatures around 200–210 °C in their guide set ✅Source. That gap is one of the clearest “profile fingerprints” when comparing ABS vs PLA.

  1. Nozzle window: a higher range typically supports strong layer fusion in materials that like more heat.
  2. Bed window: a warmer plate often stabilizes the first layers on larger footprints.
  3. Profile flexibility: both materials have room to tune, but published profiles show where each one naturally sits.

Where Each Filament Commonly Fits

ABS filament is often selected when the design calls for a blend of toughness and heat-aware performance, which is why ABS is widely used as an engineering plastic in many product categories ✅Source.

  • Functional housings with a durable feel
  • Parts near mild warmth where HDT matters
  • Impact-prone shapes where notched Izod is a helpful clue

PLA filament is often chosen for designs that prioritize clean geometry, sharp edges, and predictable profiles. In the Ingeo lineup, some grades are specifically positioned for additive manufacturing and heat-improved performance ✅Source.

  • Visual prototypes where detail is the priority
  • Jigs and fixtures that like a stiff feel
  • Dimension-focused prints where profile stability is valued

Indoor Air and Workspace Considerations

Most makers treat printing like any other small-scale thermal process: keep the area well-ventilated, avoid breathing concentrated fumes, and use general room airflow plus local exhaust when appropriate. NIOSH provides practical guidance for controlling 3D printing emissions in workspaces ✅Source.

Why This Still Matters for ABS and PLA

  • ABS printing profiles often run at higher nozzle temperatures, which can change the “fume profile” of any polymer process.
  • PLA printing profiles run cooler on many printers, yet airflow is still a smart default for comfort and consistency.
  • Ventilation is a neutral, broadly recommended setup choice for hobby and professional spaces.

Author

Beverly Damon N. is a seasoned 3D Materials Specialist with over 10 years of hands-on experience in additive manufacturing and polymer science. Since 2016, she has dedicated her career to analyzing the mechanical properties, thermal stability, and printability of industrial filaments.Having tested thousands of spools across various FDM/FFF platforms, Beverly bridges the gap between complex material datasheets and real-world printing performance. Her expertise lies in identifying the subtle nuances between virgin resins and recycled alternatives, helping professionals and enthusiasts make data-driven decisions. At FilamentCompare, she leads the technical research team to ensure every comparison is backed by empirical evidence and industry standards.View Author posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *