Skip to content

CPE vs PETG

Comparison of CPE and PETG filaments showing their thermal properties on a chart.
CPE vs PETG Comparison (Representative Published Filament Datasheet Values)
PropertyCPE (Co-Polyester Filament)PETG (Glycol-Modified PET Filament)
Material FamilyAmorphous copolyester (CPE)Amorphous copolyester (PETG)
Filament Diameter (Spec)2.85 ± 0.05 mm2.85 ± 0.05 mm
Specific Gravity1.27 g/cm³1.27 g/cm³
Glass Transition (Tg)80.0 °C77.4 °C
Heat Deflection (0.455 MPa)77.2 ± 0.6 °C76.2 ± 0.8 °C
Vicat Softening83.4 ± 0.5 °C82.9 ± 0.4 °C
Tensile (Young’s) Modulus, XY1863 ± 46 MPa1939 ± 28 MPa
Tensile Stress at Yield, XY45.3 ± 1.5 MPa46.2 ± 0.8 MPa
Elongation at Break, XY8.2 ± 0.8%7.6 ± 0.2%
Charpy Impact (Notched, 23 °C)5.8 ± 0.8 kJ/m²7.9 ± 0.6 kJ/m²
Melt Flow (MFR)13.2 g/10 min (240 °C / 2.16 kg)6.4 g/10 min (190 °C / 2.16 kg)

CPE and PETG live in the same copolyester family, yet their CPE filament and PETG filament datasheets can show slightly different mechanical and thermal balances.

The numbers in the table come from representative published filament datasheets, so you can compare like-for-like test formatting. Different brands, colors, and additives can shift Tg, HDT, and impact behavior.


Material Identity and Naming

What CPE Means in Filament

CPE in 3D printing usually means co-polyester, a tuned amorphous polyester blend designed for solid dimensional stability and chemical resistance. In one published set of values, its glass transition is 80.0 °C and its HDT at 0.455 MPa is 77.2 °C.✅Source

  • Amorphous behavior (no melting peak listed in that dataset)
  • 2.85 mm ecosystem focus in many vendor profiles
  • Balanced stiffness and yield behavior in printed specimens

What PETG Means in Filament

PETG is a glycol-modified PET-based copolyester that commonly shows a stable all-round property set. In one published set of values, its glass transition is 77.4 °C, with Vicat softening at 82.9 °C and HDT at 76.2 °C (0.455 MPa).✅Source

  • Copolyester with amorphous melting behavior listed
  • Often positioned as a dependable functional filament
  • Commonly paired with vendor support options in some ecosystems
Glass Transition (Tg)
Tg is where an amorphous plastic shifts from glassy to rubbery behavior; it strongly influences heat feel and stiffness near warm environments.
HDT at a Given Load
HDT is measured under a defined flexural load; values are only comparable when the load and method match.✅Source
Amorphous Listing
If a datasheet notes amorphous behavior, it often reports no clear melting peak; thermal transitions focus on Tg and softening points.

Mechanical Behavior and Directionality

When you compare 3D-printed test specimens, CPE and PETG can land very close in tensile numbers, while flex and impact can separate a bit more. It’s normal to see orientation effects, because layered parts behave differently in XY vs Z.

Representative 3D-Printed Specimen Values (XY Direction)
MetricCPE (XY)PETG (XY)
Tensile (Young’s) Modulus1863 MPa1939 MPa
Tensile Stress at Yield45.3 MPa46.2 MPa
Elongation at Break8.2%7.6%
Charpy Impact (Notched, 23 °C)5.8 kJ/m²7.9 kJ/m²

A clean comparison uses the same test layout and reporting style. If one datasheet uses ASTM specimens and another uses ISO specimens, you still learn a lot, but the most accurate read is within each datasheet’s own framework.


Thermal Points That Matter in Real Parts

For copolyester filaments, the warm-zone story is mostly about Tg, HDT, and Vicat. Materials like CPE and PETG are often discussed alongside other technical filaments used for engineering-grade prints because small differences in Tg and HDT can influence how parts behave in warm operating environments.

Relative Bars Based on the Two Published Values (Higher Value in This Pair = 100%)

Flexural Modulus
Flexural Modulus
Charpy Impact
Charpy Impact
HDT (0.455 MPa)
HDT (0.455 MPa)
Tg
Tg

Processing Window as Published by Manufacturers

Datasheets often publish recommended temperature ranges, and they can be surprisingly brand-specific even inside the same PET family. One published example for PETG filament lists a 230 ± 10 °C nozzle range and an 80 ± 10 °C heated bed range, with the rest of the profile tuned for high-speed FFF testing.✅Source

For CPE, some published testing notes explicitly list the conditions used to create measurement specimens. One example reports tensile bars printed at 250 °C nozzle temperature and a 70 °C build plate temperature, with the goal of consistent, repeatable test coupons rather than showcasing a universal profile.✅Source

What to Compare When Print Profiles Differ

  1. Thermal points: Tg, HDT, Vicat (same load/method whenever possible)
  2. Mechanical points: modulus, yield, break, and an impact test you trust
  3. Geometry sensitivity: look for any published XY vs Z reporting
  4. Moisture notes: absorption figures, storage claims, or drying guidance (if published)

Where Each Filament Usually Fits

CPE Alignment

  • Functional prototyping where chemical resistance and shape stability matter
  • Mechanical parts that benefit from a consistent copolyester feel
  • Applications where a slightly higher Tg can be a helpful margin

PETG Alignment

  • General-purpose functional printing with a familiar PETG filament supply chain
  • Parts where the published dataset shows higher impact values in the same reporting format
  • Use cases that value a broad set of balanced properties in the copolyester family
Author

Beverly Damon N. is a seasoned 3D Materials Specialist with over 10 years of hands-on experience in additive manufacturing and polymer science. Since 2016, she has dedicated her career to analyzing the mechanical properties, thermal stability, and printability of industrial filaments.Having tested thousands of spools across various FDM/FFF platforms, Beverly bridges the gap between complex material datasheets and real-world printing performance. Her expertise lies in identifying the subtle nuances between virgin resins and recycled alternatives, helping professionals and enthusiasts make data-driven decisions. At FilamentCompare, she leads the technical research team to ensure every comparison is backed by empirical evidence and industry standards.View Author posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *